White House Sends Saudi Nuclear Deal to the Hill — Uranium Enrichment Fight Begins
The Trump administration has sent a 30-year Saudi nuclear cooperation deal to Congress for a 90-day review that will decide if U.S. firms can build reactors and if Riyadh gets a path to enrich uranium.

The Trump administration has transmitted a 30-year civil nuclear cooperation agreement with Saudi Arabia to Congress, starting a 90-day review that will decide whether U.S. firms can build reactors in the kingdom and whether Riyadh gets a path to enrich uranium on its own soil.
Officials familiar with the classified package said it reached Capitol Hill on Monday under Section 123 of the Atomic Energy Act. Senate Foreign Relations and House Foreign Affairs will examine it during 90 days of continuous session. Unlike a treaty, the pact does not need a two-thirds Senate vote. It takes effect unless Congress passes a joint resolution of disapproval. A presidential veto of that resolution would require a two-thirds override.
Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman signed the 123 agreement and a bilateral safeguards accord on July 22. The deal is designed to lock U.S. companies—starting with Westinghouse AP1000 reactors—into Saudi Arabia’s civilian nuclear program and keep Chinese and Russian vendors out. Administration officials describe it as a multi-billion-dollar commercial partnership.
The fight on the Hill is enrichment. The 2009 U.S.-UAE “gold standard” required Abu Dhabi to forgo domestic enrichment and reprocessing. This package does not. Officials and reporting indicate a joint U.S.-Saudi study would first assess whether enrichment is commercially warranted; Americans would then build any facility without transferring the most sensitive technology, and Riyadh would be barred for a decade from developing or buying enrichment capability elsewhere. Democrats and some nonproliferation specialists say that is still a slippery slope in a region where Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has said Saudi Arabia would seek a bomb if Iran got one. Sen. Ed Markey called the accord a risk of “igniting an arms race.” The administration says the safeguards agreement, with IAEA involvement, meets high nonproliferation standards. Trump posted last month that there would be “no enrichment of material.”
Trump has separately conditioned the deal on Saudi Arabia joining the Abraham Accords and recognizing Israel—a requirement he attached the day after the signing and that is not in the text sent to Congress. An administration official told Reuters that position has not changed. Riyadh has not agreed publicly.
The timing is the Iran war. Washington is isolating Tehran economically and militarily while offering its principal Gulf rival civilian nuclear infrastructure and a potential fuel-cycle option. Critics say that undercuts the argument used to strike Iran’s program. Supporters say tying Riyadh to U.S. technology and American-built plants is the surest way to keep the kingdom from shopping in Beijing or Moscow. Congress now has three months of session to pick which risk it prefers.
Support Independent Conservative News
RWTNews is independent conservative news — no corporate backing, no agenda driven by advertisers. We rely entirely on readers like you to keep the lights on and the truth coming. If you've found value in what you read here, consider supporting us with a one-time or monthly contribution. Every dollar goes directly toward keeping this site running and growing.
Secured by Stripe. Your payment info is never stored on our servers.
