US NewsPolitics & Elections

DOJ Opens Antitrust Probe Into Five TV Networks Over Coordinated White House Pool Suspension

The Justice Department is investigating whether ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and Fox News violated antitrust law by jointly suspending White House pool coverage after CNN was barred. The department called it a possible group boycott under the Sherman Act. The networks have not detailed a response.

RWTNews StaffRWTNews Staff
President Trump speaks to the press aboard Air Force One.
President Trump speaks to the press aboard Air Force One.

The US Department of Justice is examining whether five major television networks violated antitrust rules by coordinating a suspension of White House press-pool coverage of President Donald Trump. Justice Department spokesperson Emily Covington said Saturday that “members of the television press pool have boycotted covering White House events. Group boycotts among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act.” The Antitrust Division is investigating whether the organizations broke the law.

The probe follows a late-September decision by the five broadcasters—ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC and Fox News—to stop fulfilling pool assignments after the White House restricted credentials for CNN, MS NOW and Politico. Pool members normally rotate responsibility for filming presidential events and distributing footage to other outlets. On September 21 the pool chair informed subscribers that no replacement crew would be assigned because CNN could not fulfill its scheduled duties.

The administration has argued that White House access is a privilege, not a right, and has restricted outlets it views as producing inaccurate coverage. CNN, MS NOW and Politico sued over the restrictions; a court later ordered temporary restoration of access for some of the outlets. The networks’ joint statement at the time said the public has a vital interest in independent information and that no administration should restrict a news organization because it objects to its reporting.

Covington’s statement framed the investigation as a straightforward review of whether commercial competitors engaged in a coordinated refusal to deal. The department has requested communications related to the pool arrangement and the coverage halt. None of the networks has publicly detailed a response to the probe.

The investigation is distinct from the earlier lawsuits over credential restrictions. It centers on the networks’ collective decision not to provide replacement pool coverage rather than on the content of any individual report. Antitrust enforcement against media coordination is uncommon; the Sherman Act has historically been applied to commercial boycotts among competitors.

White House officials have continued to bar CNN from certain Air Force One pool duties even after partial credential restoration. The probe was first reported by The New York Times and confirmed by the department.

Join the Team

Are you trying to break into news writing but struggling to get published at major outlets? At RWT News, we're always looking for talented, motivated writers who share our commitment to straightforward, factual conservative journalism. If you believe in honest reporting and want real experience and bylines, we'd love to hear from you.

Visit our Join the Team page to learn more and contact us directly.

You May Also Like