US NewsPolitics

Democrats' "Seditious Six" Video Ignites Federal Probe into Military Disloyalty Claims

The 90-second production, titled "Don't Give Up the Ship," surfaced on November 18, 2025, featuring the group—dubbed the "Seditious Six" by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—urging active-duty service members and intelligence officers to refuse any "illegal orders."

Tommy Flynn
From top left to bottom right:  Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, Mark Kelly of Arizona, Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, and Jason Crow of Colorado. -- Screenshots from X
From top left to bottom right: Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, Mark Kelly of Arizona, Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, and Jason Crow of Colorado. -- Screenshots from X

A video released by six Democratic lawmakers with military or intelligence backgrounds has prompted a Pentagon investigation into potential sedition, escalating tensions over alleged efforts to undermine President Trump's chain of command in the armed forces.

The 90-second production, titled "Don't Give Up the Ship," surfaced on November 18, 2025, featuring the group—dubbed the "Seditious Six" by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth—urging active-duty service members and intelligence officers to refuse any "illegal orders." The lawmakers, including Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), Rep. Jason Crow (D-Colo.), Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pa.), Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.), and Rep. Maggie Goodlander (D-N.H.), emphasized oaths to the Constitution over loyalty to individuals. Produced with professional elements like ominous music and nautical imagery, the video references historical precedents such as the Nuremberg trials, Abu Ghraib, and the My Lai massacre to underscore personal accountability for unlawful actions.

The effort aligns with broader Democratic resistance to President Trump's administration, including prior objections to military operations like strikes on Venezuelan drug boats, which the Justice Department deemed legal under 18 U.S.C. § 2332b. Critics view the video as a calculated move to instill doubt in lawful directives, potentially disrupting unit cohesion and endangering operations.

Legal scrutiny centers on 18 U.S.C. § 2387, a federal statute prohibiting any person from counseling, advising, or causing insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty in the U.S. armed forces during wartime or national emergencies. Violations carry penalties of fines or up to 10 years imprisonment. The law, enacted in 1940, targets actions that interfere with military morale and discipline, making it directly applicable to the video's call for troops to consult Judge Advocate General officers before complying with orders.

The Pentagon's response has zeroed in on Sen. Kelly, a retired Navy Captain. As a retiree from the Regular component, Kelly remains subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). On November 24, 2025, Secretary Hegseth announced a formal review of "serious allegations of misconduct" against Kelly, citing his statements as potentially violating UCMJ provisions on sedition and conduct unbecoming. Under 10 U.S.C. § 688, Kelly could be recalled to active duty for court-martial, facing charges that include up to death for mutiny or sedition in extreme cases, though administrative sanctions like reprimand or separation are more common outcomes.

Kelly, who flew 39 combat missions in Operation Desert Storm and commanded space shuttle missions, learned of the probe via Hegseth's social media post. He defended his service record and stated the review constitutes political intimidation, vowing not to be silenced. No timeline for the investigation's conclusion has been set, and legal experts anticipate challenges on First Amendment and due process grounds.

The other five members face different hurdles. Slotkin, Crow, Deluzio, and Houlahan are former military personnel but not retirees under UCMJ jurisdiction, while Goodlander is a former CIA analyst without ongoing military obligations. They cannot be recalled or court-martialed, limiting recourse to civilian federal charges under 18 U.S.C. § 2387 or related statutes like 18 U.S.C. § 2384 for seditious conspiracy. Potential penalties mirror those for Kelly—fines and imprisonment—but prosecution would require Department of Justice involvement, which has not been initiated.

President Trump labeled the video "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL" on Truth Social on November 20, 2025, calling for arrests and trials of the participants. Hegseth echoed this, describing the production as "despicable, reckless, and false" for sowing confusion among 1.3 million active-duty personnel. Democrats, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, condemned the rhetoric as threats and authoritarianism.

The incident underscores ongoing partisan friction over military authority, with no court-declared illegal orders from the Trump administration cited in the video. As the probe unfolds, it tests the boundaries of political speech versus national security imperatives in a divided government.

Like this article

You May Also Like

Comments

Democrats' "Seditious Six" Video Ignites Federal Probe into Military Disloyalty Claims | Red, White and True News